This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rowe, G. Articles by Frewer, L. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation

Institute of Food Research

Lynn J. Frewer

Institute of Food Research

There is a growing call for greater public involvement in establishing science and technology policy, in line with democratic ideals. A variety of public participation procedures exist that aim to consult and involve the public, ranging from the public hearing to the consensus conference. Unfortunately, a general lack of empirical consideration of the quality of these methods arises from confusion as to the appropriate benchmarks for evaluation. Given that the quality of the output of any participation exercise is difficult to determine, the authors suggest the need to consider which aspects of the process are desirable and then to measure the presence or quality of these process aspects. To this end, a number of theoretical evaluation criteria that are essential for effective public participation are specified. These comprise two types: acceptance criteria, which concern features of a method that make it acceptable to the wider public, and process criteria, which concern features of the process that are liable to ensure that it takes place in an effective manner. Future research needs to develop instruments to measure these criteria more precisely and identify the contextual and environmental factors that will mediate the effectiveness of the different participation methods.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Nahuis and H. van Lente Where Are the Politics? Perspectives on Democracy and Technology Science Technology Human Values, September 1, 2008; 33(5): 559 - 581. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. S. Carolan Democratizing Knowledge: Sustainable and Conventional Agricultural Field Days as Divergent Democratic Forms Science Technology Human Values, July 1, 2008; 33(4): 508 - 528. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. A. Mandarano Evaluating Collaborative Environmental Planning Outputs and Outcomes: Restoring and Protecting Habitat and the New York--New Jersey Harbor Estuary Program Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2008; 27(4): 456 - 468. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Chilvers Deliberating Competence: Theoretical and Practitioner Perspectives on Effective Participatory Appraisal Practice Science Technology Human Values, May 1, 2008; 33(3): 421 - 451. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Stirling "Opening Up" and "Closing Down": Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology Science Technology Human Values, March 1, 2008; 33(2): 262 - 294. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Chilvers Deliberating Competence: Theoretical and Practitioner Perspectives on Effective Participatory Appraisal Practice Science Technology Human Values, March 1, 2008; 33(2): 155 - 185. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Marris, P.-B. Joly, and A. Rip Interactive Technology Assessment in the Real World: Dual Dynamics in an iTA Exercise on Genetically Modified Vines Science Technology Human Values, January 1, 2008; 33(1): 77 - 100. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. Graber Obvious Decisions: Decision-making among French Ponts-et-Chaussees Engineers around 1800 Social Studies of Science, December 1, 2007; 37(6): 935 - 960. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. F. Caron-Flinterman, J. E. W. Broerse, and J. F. G. Bunders Patient Partnership in Decision-Making on Biomedical Research: Changing the Network Science Technology Human Values, May 1, 2007; 32(3): 339 - 368. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Blok Experts on public trial: on democratizing expertise through a Danish consensus conference Public Understanding of Science, April 1, 2007; 16(2): 163 - 182. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Goven Processes of Inclusion, Cultures of Calculation, Structures of Power: Scientific Citizenship and the Royal Commission on Genetic Modification Science Technology Human Values, September 1, 2006; 31(5): 565 - 598. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Higgs Integrating multi-criteria techniques with geographical information systems in waste facility location to enhance public participation Waste Management Research, April 1, 2006; 24(2): 105 - 117. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. Seifert Local steps in an international career: a Danish-style consensus conference in Austria Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2006; 15(1): 73 - 88. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Rowe, T. Horlick-Jones, J. Walls, and N. Pidgeon Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives: reflections on an evaluation of the UK GM Nation? public debate about transgenic crops Public Understanding of Science, October 1, 2005; 14(4): 331 - 352. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. S. Murdock, C. Wiessner, and K. Sexton Stakeholder Participation in Voluntary Environmental Agreements: Analysis of 10 Project XL Case Studies Science Technology Human Values, April 1, 2005; 30(2): 223 - 250. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Rowe and L. J. Frewer A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms Science Technology Human Values, April 1, 2005; 30(2): 251 - 290. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Rowe and L. J. Frewer Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda Science Technology Human Values, October 1, 2004; 29(4): 512 - 556. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W.-M. Roth, J. Riecken, L. Pozzer-Ardenghi, R. McMillan, B. Storr, D. Tait, G. Bradshaw, and T. P. Penner Those Who Get Hurt Aren't Always Being Heard: Scientist-Resident Interactions over Community Water Science Technology Human Values, April 1, 2004; 29(2): 153 - 183. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Rowe, R. Marsh, and L. J. Frewer Evaluation of a Deliberative Conference Science Technology Human Values, January 1, 2004; 29(1): 88 - 121. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Futrell Technical Adversarialism and Participatory Collaboration in the U.S. Chemical Weapons Disposal Program Science Technology Human Values, October 1, 2003; 28(4): 451 - 482. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. W. Hamlett Technology Theory and Deliberative Democracy Science Technology Human Values, January 1, 2003; 28(1): 112 - 140. [Abstract] [PDF]