|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
First published on February 5, 2008, doi:10.1177/0162243907306701
Science, Technology & Human Values 2008;33:582.
A more recent version of this article appeared on September 1, 2008
Public Proof in Courts and Jury Trials: Relevant for pTA Citizens' Juries?
Mireille Hildebrandt
and
Serge Gutwirth*
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Serge.Gutwirth{at}vub.ac.be.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
This article explores the "fair trial" as a good practice for the construction of public proof. If proof signifies closure on matter(s) at hand, and publicness is taken to signify both "access to" and "participation in" the construction of proof by the publics concerned, the authors contend that the "fair trial" is a good example of building public proof and that its backbone constraints can be of great interest to the defenders and advocates of participative Technology Assessment (pTA), especially citizens juries.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
|